有关气味与食物选择的科学文献

Found 42 results

Sort by: Author Title Type [ Year (Desc)]
Filters: Keyword is Sweetening Agents  [Clear All Filters]
1994
Powers, M. A. (1994).  Sweetener blending: how sweet it is!. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 94(5), 498-500.
Schiffman, S. S., Pecore S. D., Booth B. J., Losee M. L., Carr B. T., Sattely-Miller E., et al. (1994).  Adaptation of sweeteners in water and in tannic acid solutions.. Physiology & behavior. 55(3), 547-59. Abstract
1993
Schiffman, S. S., & Gatlin C. A. (1993).  Sweeteners: state of knowledge review.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 17(3), 313-45. Abstract
Schiffman, S. S., & Gatlin C. A. (1993).  Sweeteners: state of knowledge review.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 17(3), 313-45. Abstract
van Weerden, E. J., & Huisman J. (1993).  The digestion process of the sugar alcohol isomalt in the intestinal tract of the pig. 1. Studies with administration of isomalt in the feed. Br J Nutr. 69, 455-66. Abstract
van Weerden, E. J., & Huisman J. (1993).  The digestion process of the sugar alcohol isomalt in the intestinal tract of the pig. 2. Studies with administration of isomalt as a sweet. Br J Nutr. 69, 467-79. Abstract
1988
Kanarek, R. B., & Marks-Kaufman R. (1988).  Factors influencing the effects of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on energy intake and body weight in rats.. Appetite. 11 Suppl 1, 16-9. Abstract
Persaud, K. C., Chiavacci L., & Pelosi P. (1988).  Binding proteins for sweet compounds from gustatory papillae of the cow, pig and rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 967, 65-75. Abstract
1980
Aumaitre, A. (1980).  Palatability of piglet feeds: trial methods and practical results. Fortschr Tierphysiol Tierernahr. 86-95.
Halama, A. K. (1980).  [Sugar-coated, two-step flavored piglet starter feed]. Fortschr Tierphysiol Tierernahr. 129-32.
1979
Schiffman, S. S., Reilly D. A., & Clark T. B. (1979).  Qualitative differences among sweeteners.. Physiology & behavior. 23(1), 1-9. Abstract
1976
Baldwin, B. A. (1976).  Quantitative studies on taste preference in pigs. Proc Nutr Soc. 35, 69-73.